When readers ask me about the making of my books, I often mention that all the stories undergo a series of critiques from fellow children’s authors. These critiques are invaluable and I have at times killed a story altogether because my peers were not enthusiastic about it. In other instances I have improved stories significantly thanks to their input. Only the best of all the stories I write, the ones that undergo the merciless examination of my colleagues and receive their strong stamp of approval - get published.
To be part of such a group means two things: you need to be able to graciously accept a critique and you need to be able to critique another author’s manuscript. Both are skills and you can learn to do both.
Being able to accept a manuscript critique is like being able to accept any other constructive criticism - just know that it’s for the best and that you are being helped.
Being able to critique another author’s manuscript means that you know your craft, provide meaningful comments and that you’re able to not be a jerk in the process. A very helpful way to do it, is to put the weak sides in a sandwich, like this:
“You have a very strong hook, well done!” (Bun)
“What the %*#@ is this story about?” (Meat)
“It has great potential for wonderful illustrations.” (Bun)
This way both the critiquer and the critiquee (are these even words?) can remain friends 🙂
Leave A Response